My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Reading Morals and Dogma before MM

Bloke

Premium Member
Whilst the info is interesting, I have to ask why you find it relevant to reply on a three year old thread, as you've done here and in a number of other threads? Especially with replies that add little value.

For info necroposting is generally considered bad form on most boards...

LOL - necroposting.

I actually like it - makes sure you don't have 20 threads on the same topic. In forums I've moderated, I actually encourage "necroposting" (but only now heard the amusing term). However I understand not all are fans of the practise... but I am.
 

chrmc

Registered User
LOL - necroposting.

I actually like it - makes sure you don't have 20 threads on the same topic. In forums I've moderated, I actually encourage "necroposting" (but only now heard the amusing term). However I understand not all are fans of the practise... but I am.

I think it's somewhat ok when you add something new or relevant to the debate.
But if it's just nonsense that does nothing but boost your post count I find it rude.
 

Bloke

Premium Member
I think it's somewhat ok when you add something new or relevant to the debate.
But if it's just nonsense that does nothing but boost your post count I find it rude.

Boosting post count would not be the intent. There has been some interesting content revived if not interesting it will die. Sorry if the practice annoys...
 

Warrior1256

Site Benefactor
Whilst the info is interesting, I have to ask why you find it relevant to reply on a three year old thread, as you've done here and in a number of other threads? Especially with replies that add little value.

For info necroposting is generally considered bad form on most boards...
When I come across an old thread the subject of which interests me I revive it for further discussion. I didn't know there was anything wrong with that.
 

Ripcord22A

Site Benefactor
I personally have no problem with someone reviving a thread, especially if its one i havent read. What does bother me is when its a thread with a question pertaining to the OPs point in time and someone revives it with out reading the whole thing or with giving advice specific to the OP and the thread has beem dead for like 3 years. Especially when it gets revived with something like "ur just fc you need to chill out" its like bro its been 3yrs hes more then likely a mm by now

Sent from my LG-H811 using My Freemasonry Pro mobile app
 
Top