AndreAshlar
Registered User
Masonic lineage, John G. Jones, his expulsion from PHA masonry and his formation of "bogus" GL's is a great place to start.Awesome, thanks for the share. I still wonder how do you choose if you will AF&AM or F&AM ?
Masonic lineage, John G. Jones, his expulsion from PHA masonry and his formation of "bogus" GL's is a great place to start.Awesome, thanks for the share. I still wonder how do you choose if you will AF&AM or F&AM ?
No brother, not clandestine lodges. I'm talking about the split between "regular" AF&AM and F&AM not anything bogus.Masonic lineage, John G. Jones, his expulsion from PHA masonry and his formation of "bogus" GL's is a great place to start.
That's what I'm asking, when freemasonry began was it AF&AM or F&AM ?
There are some GLS that are AF&AM and some are F&AM. I wonder what the difference is. I remember having this discussion before, but I can't recall the difference.
BeautifulBefore the 1812 merger of the Antients and Moderns into the United Grand Lodge of England, those two GLs sponsored lodges in the colonies and those colonies organized into their own jurisdictions. Mostly the ones on the eastern seaboard descended from the Moderns used the term F&AM. Mostly the ones on the eastern seaboard descended from the Antients used the term AF&AM. Once we get to states formed after the Revolution it's much more random because some states formed by lodges from several older states.
The original African Lodge 459 was chartered by the Moderns, what we sometimes call the Premier Grand Lodge of England, the jurisdiction funded in 1717. For a while the names of Prince Hall descended jurisdictions was more random, but over time more and more switched to Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of (state) and they use the term F&AM. Why do all regularly descended PHA jurisdictions use the term F&AM? I suspect it's because they descended from the Premier Grand Lodge of England and that was the tradition among jurisdictions descended from that historical jurisdiction. I als suspect the details state to state are more complex than that simple summary of lineage.
Now all of the regular PHA jurisdictions use F&AM - http://www.conferenceofgrandmasterspha.org/gjlinks.asp
Using AF&AM together with Prince Hall ensures clandestine status. Using F&AM together with PHA means it's worth looking a lodge up on the regularity list.
I think someone is having you on. Which Grand Lodges were united to form the UGLE? When was that?
If you want a GL for 1717, try the Grand Lodge of London and Westminster. Note that there is no claim of jurisdiction outside that small area.
Brother AndreAshlar consult with your Senior Deacon or your Lodge Historian to give you some clarification...Are there any regular "4 letter" Prince Hall GL's? I don't know of any.
There are no regular, 4-letter PHA lodges on American soil.Brother AndreAshlar consult with your Senior Deacon or your Lodge Historian to give you some clarification...
Are you a PHA brother or GL brother ?The Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Liberia uses the AF&AM.
The "3 letter/4 letter" monikers mean absolutely nothing as many Grand Lodges in America have used both or others.
Aaron Christopher
Cervantes #5
Grand Lodge of Louisiana F&AM
Are you a PHA brother or GL brother ?
That's what I'm asking, when freemasonry began was it AF&AM or F&AM ?
I always understood we were F&AM. See http://www.ugle.org.uk/images/files/2015DecBoCCraftRules.pdfJust as a footnote to the conversation; UGLE is AF&AM.
I always understood we were F&AM. See http://www.ugle.org.uk/images/files/2015DecBoCCraftRules.pdf
My certificate states "United Grand Lodge of Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons of England."I always understood we were F&AM. See http://www.ugle.org.uk/images/files/2015DecBoCCraftRules.pdf