My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

A Brother Asks: Why Is Excluding Women Legitimate?

Warrior1256

Site Benefactor
We belong to a Freemasonic Order, and so do they! To not show respect and expect respect in return is a double standard to which we should not abide nor support.
I certainly agree! I try to treat everyone with dignity and respect. It's just that any Masonic organization that allows women members is not "regular" Masonry according to the Masonic organization that I belong to and support. But that certainly doesn't mean that I would treat them in any sort of demeaning way.
 

Brother JC

Moderating Staff
Staff Member
They are legitimate the same way the Moose, Elks, VFW, etc are also legitimate.

This actually brings up a different question; why don’t we consider some of these animal fraternities to be clandestine to our cause? The Eagles used our lodge layout, our ritual, everything masonic to create their Aeries, but we don’t say a word. Some of us even join because they have cheap beer...
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
Personally, I do not expect respect in return because I would see no reason for anyone outside of Mainstream / PHA Freemasonry to call me anything other than my name.
Understood. However, the statement was quite clear: To not show respect and expect respect in return is a double standard to which we should not abide nor support.

When you don't expect something, this would not apply.
Women have no option available to them (in reference to Mainstream Freeemasonry) so their formation of a separate Freemasonic organization(s) is valid (if they determine it to be so). Anyone else, I'd gladly instruct them how to obtain an application in the jurisdiction they are.
Yep! And I'd gladly instruct anyone else in what to look for too, if within my ability and if available as an option.
Having said all of this... by no means am I suggesting anyone leave whatever group they are in nor that they should care one bit whether I or anyone else recognizes them. We should be respectful to all regardless of recognition, and whether your a "Brother" or not, you should be treated as a friend which in my world means more like family. Regardless of who or what you are, how I act is a reflection of me... not the person I'm interacting with.
Agreed!
 

LK600

Premium Member
This actually brings up a different question; why don’t we consider some of these animal fraternities to be clandestine to our cause? The Eagles used our lodge layout, our ritual, everything masonic to create their Aeries, but we don’t say a word. Some of us even join because they have cheap beer...

My reply to this would be exactly what Brother Cook stated quoted below...

Because they don’t claim to make Masons.

This all day.
 

LK600

Premium Member
Understood. However, the statement was quite clear: To not show respect and expect respect in return is a double standard to which we should not abide nor support.

I agree, and would suggest a Brother who does not recognize Irregular Masonic styled organization(s) and yet demands that they recognize him is quite confused. The only recognition that should be expected is from within.
 

Number4

Registered User
Where else in Western Society other than Freemasonry would it be seen as completely normal and acceptable (and approved) that two grown heterosexual men can sit publicly holding each others hands ?

Among combat veterans mourning a fallen Brother in Arms. It's no coincidence that many of the Craft are active or retired military - for my part Masonry is everything I like about my time in the army (without the 5 mile runs before breakfast!)
 

Number4

Registered User
"could it be that all lodges (whether UGLE recognizes them or not) consider themselves regular?"

That's like saying I consider my self a helicopter, but neither the FAA or the Air Force recognize me as such :)
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
"could it be that all lodges (whether UGLE recognizes them or not) consider themselves regular?"

That's like saying I consider my self a helicopter, but neither the FAA or the Air Force recognize me as such :)
As humorous as your comment is meant to be, it is fallacious. Regularity is determined by the governing Grand Lodge.
 

coachn

Coach John S. Nagy
Premium Member
Just James said:
Since a Freemason's lodge extends from E to W, N to S and from the center of the Earth to the Heavens, it is quite hard to exclude women.
Typical Logical Fallacy... changing the meaning of a word to suit your argument... Metaphor and reality are two entirely different directions with entirely different foundations.
 
Top