My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
What does this quote mean to you?
- Thread starter rhitland
- Start date
I thought you might have some more awesome youtube footage to share...
no..thats all me:2::35:
What a second so if I am in a rocket ship going the SoL and I am wearing a watch made set to work on earth time would it spin faster? To add to that last question; If time is different from my perception on earth compared to yours on a rocket going the SoL whose time is right?
And to bring the dork part back in I still see this as all being altered by our minds. Not in a meditational astral plaining trance like your thinking Mr Genius. Here is how I believe the mind has effected or altered time. Traveling the SoL would require an awesome machine right? How would one build that machine? From the power of the mind of man. From where all of reality is derived at least in my opinion. :huh:
Last edited:
And with that, Bro. Disney, you can go get your money back from TCU. lol
its too late..tcu already cashed his check
all right ladies, pay attention.
the clock on the spaceship ticks faster RELATIVE to the "stationary" clock on Earth. both times are right in their respective frame of reference because that's what it depends on.
just a communication issue, you could have been clearer about the mind thing. anyway, yes, traveling the speed of light (different from accelerating to it b/c thats impossible) would require much more advanced technology (anti-gravity) and understanding of physics. so indirectly, the mind might alter time. or wait...there are particles that move very near c, at c and faster than c (in a non-vacuum) and time for those particles is different. they have no mind. just because we may have the capability to put ourselves in a reference frame where time is different as compared to Earth, does not mean we affect it. you would not notice the difference because it all appears the same in that frame.
but how is reality derived from the human mind? did it not exist before man? if that were true, then reality must cease to exist when a man dies, but it appears that's not true. its like the tree falling in the forrest question (which I never understood why that is so hard).
and with that, Bro. Shelly, you can go cry.
the clock on the spaceship ticks faster RELATIVE to the "stationary" clock on Earth. both times are right in their respective frame of reference because that's what it depends on.
just a communication issue, you could have been clearer about the mind thing. anyway, yes, traveling the speed of light (different from accelerating to it b/c thats impossible) would require much more advanced technology (anti-gravity) and understanding of physics. so indirectly, the mind might alter time. or wait...there are particles that move very near c, at c and faster than c (in a non-vacuum) and time for those particles is different. they have no mind. just because we may have the capability to put ourselves in a reference frame where time is different as compared to Earth, does not mean we affect it. you would not notice the difference because it all appears the same in that frame.
but how is reality derived from the human mind? did it not exist before man? if that were true, then reality must cease to exist when a man dies, but it appears that's not true. its like the tree falling in the forrest question (which I never understood why that is so hard).
and with that, Bro. Shelly, you can go cry.
Because that is a question one cannot wrap their mind around with conventional knowledge. Hence why it came from a Buddhist Monk.
"If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?" is a philosophical riddle that raises questions regarding observation and knowledge of reality.
George Berkeley was an Irish philosopher who created and promoted a theory he called "immaterialism" later referred to as "subjective idealism". His dictum was "Esse est percipi" - "To be is to be perceived".[1] He talked of objects ceasing to exist once there was nobody around to perceive them
Watch this video link the whole 10 mins is good but the only part I want you to see Lester is from 1:02 to 5:31 it is about observation and its effect on reality.
[video=youtube;MoTBaa5gS30]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoTBaa5gS30[/video]
Einstein is one of the greatest thinkers of our time no argument their but his theories only take us so deep. I want to start another thread to go deeper.
