My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Building Trust Within Lodge

handshake_2947510b.jpg


We often hear lodges are not increasing membership and/or that many members don’t attend meetings. Part of the reason is that some lodge officers don’t understand the relationships between themselves, establishing innovative and motivating activities, and their abilities to relate to the modern generation of younger members. This is essential to correct, in order to respond to the members needs efficiently, informatively, and professionally. I.E., there is a barrier or breakdown of trust because young members live, work, and think differently from previous generations. Yes, the younger members are seeking knowledge through “Masonic Principles” but they expect more from their lodges, lodge officers, and seek a more personalized service, as building lodge brand loyalty more on an individualized basis which becomes the foundation for long term lodge loyalty and encouraging word of mouth and internet recommendations to others.

How can the focus of personalized trust improve or increase member loyalty/retention and build meaningful rapport with lodge members in general? One of the most important factors is having a committed, well informed, and professional lodge officer corps. This comes from long term education, innovation, 21st Century thinking, training, and motivation of/by the lodge officers delivering a consistent lodge environment that encourages and sustains member satisfaction. Otherwise, the lodge can expect low attendance, less qualified officers in line, and loss of overall interest in the lodge. Basically every lodge needs a good “Public Relations Program” for the members and the community at large to build trust internally and externally.

If there is a large turnover due to a lack of attendance in relation to the overall number of members who are still within close proximity of the lodge, and are physically able to attend meetings, this suggests a low commitment within the lodge corresponding to a lack of trust between members and the lodge. Unfortunately, many members drift away because attitudes of some lodge officers and the way they conduct meetings have not changed for the conditions and attitudes of 21st Century members. Today’s members want more than having coffee and hearing bills read. They expect some type of informative meetings which build the trust that they initially had in their lodges, as well as participating in activities, becoming lodge committee members, presenting some type of educational (Masonic/Non Masonic) information, and/or even potential lodge officers. All this contributes to building trust between members and lodges. Without providing recognized values, it’s no wonder so many member attitudes have changed towards ineffective lodges/lodges officers who pay less and less attention to good member relationships.

How do you build confidence and loyalty? By examining one of the factors that makes a lodge great, and that’s “trust.” When members have concerns that their lodge officers are uncertain

about their lodge commitments or feel that they care less about members as individuals then what members feel about their lodge/lodge officers, then trust is definitely lost. However, just the opposite happens when we see lodge officers are delivering fully informed and holistic approaches to developing or strengthening their lodge and lodge officer corps. I.E., it becomes a more engaged rapport with the entire membership. This latter approach builds trust because it demonstrates confidence and motivates lodge brand loyalty.

Lodge officers are the voice of their specific lodge brand. Since confidence builds trust, it encourages lodge loyalty. However, a lack of confidence contributes to doubt and doubt results in membership attrition, and a less experienced/trained lodge officer corps. The less experienced or trained lodge officers are less confident in their own actions, and the development of pro-active activities. Therefore, the viscous circle of member disloyalty erodes the dynamics of lodges.

How do we sustain high levels of lodge officer knowledge in decision making processes that build trust internally and externally? Here are 3 methods that help to develop a culture of trust:

1-Develop programs that provide lodge officers with necessary knowledge and information about the core principles to answer any questions about their lodge but particularly Masonry. I.E., they have to know what they are talking about to other Masons or Non Masons. This is all part of “Masonic Education.” Unfortunately, there are too many lodge officers or other brethren that really don’t know much about ancient or modern “Masonic Topics” or the relationships of all Masonic Bodies to each other. Thus, the problem is putting lodge officers who really are not qualified or properly trained into stations and places just because they are an available body. This problem perpetuates a lack of confidence or trust that is sensed by both the new and current members who may eventually drift away because they receive no value for their membership.

2-Keep the lodge officers motivated and focused on good business practices, as well as reinforcing “Masonic Knowledge” with some form of incentives to learn and take an active interest in what they represent. It’s not difficult to provide information, tips or advice. It’s only a matter of commitment.

3-Encourage/Develop lodge brand loyalty by using visual communications tools, such as websites, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Information media reinforces lodge messages, and demonstrates modern means of communications. We live in a digital age so let’s use it, not only with written commentaries but with photos of what our lodges are doing to build interest and trust factors for current brethren and potential candidates. All lodges can build a two way trust process that motivates the entire membership by building a stronger rapport between pro-active lodge officers with their members.

Combinations of trust, training, and modern increased use of information instills lodge officers to become more pro-active by taking pride in what they do and the lodge brand that they represent. Thus, lodge officers are able to deliver on member needs at a higher and more efficient level balanced with “Masonic Philosophy” to build a strong trust factor between themselves, the lodge brand, and all members.

Source: John Loayza, Assistant Grand Chancellor
Grand Lodge of Illinois, A.F. & A.M.
 

Bloke

Premium Member
Reminds me of this one

Masonic Capital

Don’s Diary
Most readers will be familiar with the term “Political Capital": sentiment that a politician has a legitimate mandate to enact policy in the eyes of the voting public. (http://www.politicalcapital.info) It refers to the trust, goodwill, and influence a politician has with the public and other political figures, a type of invisible currency. However, can it be applied to elected offices in Freemasonry as it can be to other non-parliamentary institutions – could we then call it Masonic Capital? Can the sentiment produce a strong quantum of capital after a Political election, a time in politics often called “the honeymoon period”? Can Political Capital be lost, and how? How can Political Capital be accumulated?


Thankfully, most Freemasons will respect “the office” of their leaders even if they are unenthusiastic about the incumbent. If there is Worshipful Master or another leader with little or no Masonic Capital, members may withdraw from active participation at meetings and if we are fortunate they will maintain an association with their brethren. They will hope that in the next cycle of elections Freemasonry will get a leader it deserves, one with a high level of Political Capital – hope it will now all just go away! If we will be unlucky if disruptive disfranchised freemasons attend meetings and create disharmony. Leaders are not likely to accumulate much Political Capital on their election unless there has been a wide voting franchise (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Universal+franchise) and in Freemasonry a candidate should have demonstrated that he excels at furthering the three great principles of masonry – brotherly love, relief and truth. It is likely that he will benefit by demonstrating a capability to “grow” Freemasonry by his personal community high standing, increasing its numbers, retention, community “penetration”, infrastructure and wealth to support greater benevolence. It will be a disadvantage to be seen to have been supported by an amicus curiae group, no matter how powerful. No lodge, despite its exclusiveness and distinguished membership, can confer Political Capital. A process which is seen to have been designed to secure a particular type of outcome will not gain Political Capital. It will be a disadvantage to be seen in the past to have been responsible for or closely associated with strategic policy decisions that have not enjoyed wide spread support.


It will be difficult to earn Masonic Capital unless things are done that the greater majority of Freemasons believe to be important – to further our principles and growth. A campaign trying to sell what many will see to be unimportant achievements or just saying we are good people will not wash in the pub test. We need to have mandated performance objectives at the highest levels as are found in a Public Company.


Without a high quantum of Political Capital and the potential to accumulate more midterm, a leader will be unlikely to be able to harness the energies of Freemasonry, motivate its members, arrest the decline in numbers and its community standing, and substantially further its objectives both in individual Lodges and our other Masonic Organisations.


May all of Lodge Devotions current and future leaders enjoy strong and deserved Masonic Capital and employ it wisely.


Yours fraternally ,

Don

http://www.lodgedevotion.net/devotionnews/donsdiary/masonic-capital

There is also two articles in that section written by Don on "Trust"
 
Top