Search results

Pike was a man that would look at all things and try to pull them together into one writing for better understanding. When you read Morals and Dogma you need to have had a history lession on what was going on in politics and society and how grammer was used at the time. What he wrote if read...

au contraire mon frere, By calling anything like that only Myth you will miss good starting places for your research in to all things. That is the flat earth mantality to discredit then to discard if you see no value in it. All things point to useful information/data. Look at what was said...

Yes I agree but the question is "Do you believe in Darwinian evolution?" There ar many evelution theorys. Thats why they are theorys and they are all based on the same anthropological data. Theorys are really the part of the paper that is not data/proof. If this is not going to start a...

Nothing is mutually exclusive excpet in some peoples minds and any man is a fool if they think they can say that is fact!!! You can only understand as much as the data at the time of the theory being writen down. New information is always comming in. There is more and new that several species...

I just have said Darwins theory of evolution. I did not ever say evolution doesn't happen and I am not trying to PROVE creationism because they I beleive they are not mutually exclusive. When I look a theory I don't try to disprove them I use them to try to prove my theories wrong. When you...

Also just because you have spent more time doing something doen't mean you know more about it than any other person.

No that is not it at all.....My answer to the question was no i don't beleive in Darwins theory of eveloution and the statment that went with it was It is just a theory. The others beleive seam to think they have to convince me that my answer was wrong by saying I know nothing about science...

Am I going to have to give you the jedi wave and say look at the big picture to show you everything is connected and that there is no consensus. The word mainstream means only what the person saying means.

You are still not looking at the big picture. There are many theorys of eveloution before and after Darwin. The question was do you beleive in "Darwins" theroy of eveloution. I did not say eveloution doesn't exist but that I did not beleive in Darwins theory and others have come back saying...

Ya this is me now that other pick was in my office taken by my assistant when I needed a pic for a Bio.

This is what is hard about finding you own voice in life and how diety is invalved. Don't let anyone tell you what they think you think. look an analize you own feelings and see which religion most goes with your beleifs. I am a Christian with the denomations of "disciple of christ" and we...

That was not howI inturped what I read in some of the budist writings. It is what ishard not knowing enough of the lanaguage to inturpet it right.

Sorry for the miss understanding

I understand what you said here but it is not religion you should be mad at but the Dogma of a certian religion. The Christianity you are probley railing against is the dogma man has put on that version. My dogma on christianity is that it is the ten commandments and that God sent Jesus to...

I was trying to edit post #252 and change for to forth but it looked like #252 did not happen so I was starting over.

No it was never setforth as a theory. If you really look at Darwins theory there is data for other eveloutionary origins. there are 3 other archaeology sources for the tree other than Africa which is stated in his theory.

No it was never put for as a theory but as fact so it did not go through the peir process as a theory. The Darwin theory of evolution has been tested but using only the data for Darwin's timefreme. In the last 60 years archaeologist have found evloution data that doesn't fit his theory because...

Just checking did you mean I was having the Dunning-Kruger effect? I don't have all the data in your mind to process this.

I tried to add this line to my last post but it would not let me. A scientific theory is just a theory that is repeatedly tested but I say why do you repeatly test something?....because it looks like something is wrong.

Remember the research on the algorithm I am in valved in and yes Religion, art, Politics and Science and in volved in how we procive things. Adding the word scientific to the word theory doesen't make the word theory anymore proof it only make it sound like you are trying to convince someone and...