The rules may be different, but the obligation is the same. I've been to many degrees, in many states and many countries. Even in languages, I have not understood. The words are different, but the obligation is the same. This is so unfortunate about this. I understand why an earlier post said it is a hamster wheel. It appears no one really listens to their obligation. Hence the same argument. Over and over. I am stepping out of this discussion. Not because I do not want to respond to what Grand Lodge I am part of, or what lodge I am a member of. It is because it is all the same fraternal order and we should all be on the same page, and in the discussion, I am not with like minded brothers. That upsets me. I am a traveling man, someday I will very likely be to your lodge, and my stance will be the same. There is no place for a tattoo of the square and compass on a mason. Not just because it violates an obligation, but it also cheapens the value of the symbol. This is coming from mason with many tattoos. God speed my brother who asked this question. Let your light be your guide.
Why is it tattoos have been around for such a long time, and it is only in the recent years, masons and non masons alike are tattooing themselves with the square and compass? Perhaps the craft is loosing its way? I am not sure, but it is a very real question. And one that every mason should be asking themselves.
On the level.
My Freemasonry HD