Allen Sharp
Registered User
I have read the "Proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Texas " for 2007. Page 399 is the Reconsideration of Resolution No. 3. I will quote part of what was said. "...can find nowhere in their by-laws where it stipulates that Hells Angles, Ku Klux Klan... could not be member of that club." And "I have closely examined the Widow's Son patch which clearly depicts a stripper dancing around a stripper's pole...".
Well clearly the Brother has never seen the patch and is misinformed. I'm looking at one right now and she is not dancing around a pole. There is no pole on the patch nor is she naked or half dressed. As for the by-laws as one brother already pointed out in a later post they had to do that until GL addopted Resolution No.3.
My only problem is the following and I would like the questions answered please.
1. Why did it take three years for this edict?
2. When the edict appeared on the GL web page there was a link to post comments. There were several that supported the Widow Sons. What happened to that link and the post?
I hope cooler heads will win out and those Brothers who belonged will be able to wear there vest again. Remember we are all Brothers.
Allen Sharp
Gatesville 197
Well clearly the Brother has never seen the patch and is misinformed. I'm looking at one right now and she is not dancing around a pole. There is no pole on the patch nor is she naked or half dressed. As for the by-laws as one brother already pointed out in a later post they had to do that until GL addopted Resolution No.3.
My only problem is the following and I would like the questions answered please.
1. Why did it take three years for this edict?
2. When the edict appeared on the GL web page there was a link to post comments. There were several that supported the Widow Sons. What happened to that link and the post?
I hope cooler heads will win out and those Brothers who belonged will be able to wear there vest again. Remember we are all Brothers.
Allen Sharp
Gatesville 197