From what I have been told the Grand Line in the State of Arkansas are all of the same mindset as the last two Grandmasters and this will remain for the next 10 years at least. That being the case is it right for any Grand Lodge to not take action if another is acting in what appears to be an unmasonic manner? Where does masonary draw the line not even taking into account the Arkansas, Florida, Michigan or South Carolina situations? Should there not be an accountablility not only of each Grand Lodge to masonry but to each other to make sure the ideals are being held up? In Arkansas what happened with the Shrine should never have happened. The Shrine should have shuttered those temples imho. To allow non-masons into the Shrine was a cop out. However, I also feel that the Grand Lodges in North America let those masons in Arkansas down by not acting to review the situation and in the absence of that each grand lodge can do what it wants to its members. Masonary is supposed to be about making good men better men is it not? We have all seen examples of how this is not always the case. Maybe if grand lodges were accountable to each other for actions this type of thing may not start at all.