You've given up your vote.
There are different types of votes.
1) There are the votes of the representatives on the floor at GL. These are the pedestal officers at least, plus depending on the jurisdiction some fraction of the PMs, plus depending on the jurisdiction some number of GL granted votes for past whatever and appointed whatever. There's a historical trend in my jurisdictions for the grand line to ask GL to vote in more and more votes for past whatever and appointed whatever folks.
Not all brothers go through the line to have a chance to participate in that type of vote. Not all that many brothers once they are on the floor understand that they can vote against the current grand line. One or more brothers who do have this type of votes would need to step forward - And there tend to be rules against campaigning which is exactly what is needed to step up a vote-out reform of that sort.
I suggest that some brothers get together and propose themselves in opposition to the current line, but I will note that I have never do this, I am not in Arkansas and I could not afford the monetary cost of being a GM. As such my suggestion is from the peanut gallery.
2) If legislation is submitted on the type of topic that would resolve this issue AND if a local lodge even has a meeting to discuss GL legislation AND if the lodge is willing to instruct their representatives to vote a specific way AND if the delegates don't simply vote as they choose, then brothers not a part of the line system can participate in a vote at the local lodge level.
There are more hurdles than that list in this case. Consider the PHA recognition situation. Many brothers aren't even aware that they can submit through the legislation process to force an issue (This year I wrote to the California Gr Sec about missing recognitions instead of submitting legislation) and someone has to submit legislation for a vote to happen at all. Or a group has to come forward to replace the grand line, that has to be known for it to even come up at lodge discussions.
3) Voting with your feet and wallet by demit really does count as voting. If and only if you made it clear in your demit why you did so and what changes would need to happen before you'd come back. A lot of Arkansas Masons have submitted their demits, but how many of them said why and what changes?
People know why the demits have been happening, but denial is rampant inside my mind. It's got to be just as rampant in the entrenched grand line.
That third type of vote is the type that could eventually lead to the GLofAR folding. France cleaned up its own grand line problems by doing the equivalent of term limit up and out on their former GM. How many years of up and out would be needed before natural attrition resolves the issue in AR?