A7V
Registered User
Can a Brother still be considered active and a benefit to Masonry if they never set foot in a lodge?
If someone does research for the good of Masonry, or things on those lines but doesn't attend lodge, is that so bad?
This came to mind about two weeks ago when I was sitting in lodge as the Senior Deacon Pro Tem and realized I get nothing out of listening to them argue over who pays the bills, and listen to the new WM try to start up a fundraiser no one gives a damn about.
I started to think, with the online world the way it is, and lodges becoming what they are becoming. Why can't someone be considered active this way?
If someone does research for the good of Masonry, or things on those lines but doesn't attend lodge, is that so bad?
This came to mind about two weeks ago when I was sitting in lodge as the Senior Deacon Pro Tem and realized I get nothing out of listening to them argue over who pays the bills, and listen to the new WM try to start up a fundraiser no one gives a damn about.
I started to think, with the online world the way it is, and lodges becoming what they are becoming. Why can't someone be considered active this way?