Just from memory, I'll take a guess. Wasn't the GMA started in 1717, broken apart by a schism, and the two factions came back together decades later to form the UGLE?
Ok, then what is it?
Just from memory, I'll take a guess. Wasn't the GMA started in 1717, broken apart by a schism, and the two factions came back together decades later to form the UGLE?
What "is also called the 'Premier Lodge'"?see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premier_Grand_Lodge_of_England
It is also called the "Premier Lodge"
Check out the URL, from Wikipedia, and check out the private response.
This thread is for discussions of what you would like to see changed/improved. Let's try to keep the postings "on point".
Re: What would you like to see changed in the Maso
Any Grand Lodge officer who cannot cope with modern technology, needs to resign or be impeached.
Any Mason who has difficulty with the internet, needs to check with his local library or vocational school and learn about e-mail, etc.
If a Grand Lodge officer is unable to cope with 21st century technology, and gets "pushed out" of Freemasonry, then good. Masonry is better off without such men.
Do you really believe that?
Any Grand Lodge officer who cannot cope with modern technology, needs to resign or be impeached.
If this is a bid to earn the respect of your peers you might want to rethink your strategy.I stand on my statement. Like it or not, Masonry, and the world are in the "internet age". If a Grand officer is unable to understand this, then he is clearly behind the times, and there it is.
But you were quoted as saying "Masonry is better off without such men." Surely you misspoke. Did you just mean they weren't qualified to be a GLO?I stand on my statement. Like it or not, Masonry, and the world are in the "internet age". If a Grand officer is unable to understand this, then he is clearly behind the times, and there it is.
I was replying to your post, so you must have thought it was "on point" at the time you made your post. I am trying to find out if you are saying that the UGLE is also called the "Premiere Lodge".
...
If this is a bid to earn the respect of your peers you might want to rethink your strategy.
But you were quoted as saying "Masonry is better off without such men." Surely you misspoke. Did you just mean they weren't qualified to be a GLO?
Read into my statements, what you wish. Most people do, anyway. I mean exactly what I said. Masonry is better off without men in leadership, who cannot deal with the present state of technology.
Similar to myself. Dec 2012 and Feb 2013 for me. I will tell Brothers that my one regret so far is how quick I moved through the first three degrees. I wish I had purposely spent more time as an EA and FC. After all, you are a MM for life, but and EA/FC for a woefully short period. A lot of lessons to be learned that are sadly skipped over.I was initiated in February 2012 and raised in June 2012, just under 6 months time. Looking back, I feel that I moved way too fast. I would like to see longer minimum time cycles between degrees to give new brothers time to learn lessons rather than just learn words.
But you were quoted as saying "Masonry is better off without such men." Surely you misspoke. Did you just mean they weren't qualified to be a GLO?
Technology is so central to leadership because of what reason? If GL sees no value in technology how does it hurt anyone? They're still our brothers, regardless if they care about websites or know how to use an IPhone.
You're making broad brushstrokes on a very vague canvas here. I've been watching this thread for a few days now and it's been slowly devolving. Let's get back on topic, as others have said.
I was initiated in February 2012 and raised in June 2012, just under 6 months time. Looking back, I feel that I moved way too fast. I would like to see longer minimum time cycles between degrees to give new brothers time to learn lessons rather than just learn words.