The way I see it, the question of 1717 vs 1721, comes down to simply this, what was the main motive for the formation of a GL in the first place, is it prudent to assume that the dae of 1717 was selected only for the purpose of establishing an early lineage, or were the founders in need of creating a formal legitimacy, the main event at that the contest of succession and the movement to return the house of Stuate the throne.
The political climate was intense at that time and most influential people involved themselves in the politics of the day, as did the Masons.
The real need for the formation of a Grand Lodge was evident in 1717, somewhat more so than 1721
The political climate was intense at that time and most influential people involved themselves in the politics of the day, as did the Masons.
The real need for the formation of a Grand Lodge was evident in 1717, somewhat more so than 1721