My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
“..full of wise and learned view…”
Well, we’re full of something. :).
I understand your point, and the balance between openness and maintaining mystique. One of my favorite moments in my mother lodge is the lighting which leaves the officers in shadow during the degree. With a nod to Brother...
Yes. We have many “trained” in the rituals, like a clever parrot, but understanding the rituals? Not so much.
So, we continue our education, we care for each other, we do good works, we help other lodges, we fellowship. In sum, we mason.
But Freemasonry has always had the social element as a prominent aspect. The first GL was founded in a tavern. My UGLE lodge met in taverns. The buildings still have bars where we spend time after a meeting. I point this out not because it is a bar, but to demonstrate the social aspect.
As to...
Need? No, a bar isn’t needed. But as a convenient place to chat and enjoy one another’s comp, it’s great.
My buildings in England have bars. I don’t drink. I still enjoy my time there.
May I ask why you feel so strongly on the subject that you would stop attending?
I haven’t experienced that.
Note, those who are the embarrassment are all masons. Each were voted into a lodge. So, perhaps it is masons who shouldn’t exist?
It would also appear that the behavior would still exist, as the individuals involved in the behavior would still be masons.
I would add that if the individuals named in the movie were alive, they would be able to maintain a defamation action. Pete Normand wrote on the matter.