jjjjjggggg
Premium Member
Do you ever find your self being at a freind place watching BBT and laughing when mo one else is and then having to explain what they just said.
Usually it's me laughing and my wife calling me a big nerd.
Do you ever find your self being at a freind place watching BBT and laughing when mo one else is and then having to explain what they just said.
Yes and did you see the word Darwin any where in it? The answer is No. hince the Subject of this thread. I don't say things don't evolve. I just reject how Darwin and his buddies used of it for polictics.
Did i miss them? Oh I see now I guess I missed them because natural slection was not really Darwin and 9 just did not hit me as important.Actually, Darwin's name was in points 7 and 9, and I still am not sure if you are objecting to evolution. Or are you objecting to Darwin as a person, or what exactly is the point of contention?
How did you change your name to ej6267?
Yes you are getting a bit of a lecture on science, because you don't understand the basics, you clearly have done some reading, but you also clearly do not have the basic background to actually understand it.
Watched a great video with Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson. He was chastising atheists for their insistence on their a-holery toward "believers".
Dr. Tyson pointed out that 7% of elite scientists are believers and before working over the general public about belief that they might try and figure that one out. His point being, I think, is that even among those that have deep understanding of the scientific method are a few who still cling to irrational thought.
Darwins theory is one of many. Why is it the one people fight for the most. They are all theories that use the same data they just don't have the same conclustion being drawn.
The way I see it right now is that the ain't religus crowed is trying to hold down the religus crowd un till the yell uncle.
Most Darwinest use his theory to say there is no God and that is what make me wonder about all of these Masons here.
Darwinisam is one of the tools used by the ...
Big Bang theory.....Sheldon
Do you ever find your self being at a freind place watching BBT and laughing when mo one else is and then having to explain what they just said.
Usually it's me laughing and my wife calling me a big nerd.
I have written on why it is not irrational to believe in the existance of deity. That's it's own entire long, boring and complex thread.
Point me to the thread... would love to read it.l
... but that atheists default to a god belief as irrational.
No people fight for what they think is right using only a little data in stead of looking at all of it. Most Darwinest think that this is only a two part answer. Darwin's theory is one of many hince "just a theory" and if you don't think it is completly right the pro-darwin forces attack you first a you don't know anything about science and then you are stupid. I don't bend to pressure and ther are more theorys our there about evolution than you can shake a stick at. Most Darwinest use his theory to say there is no God and that is what make me wonder about all of these Masons here. Darwinisam is one of the tools used by the comunist to get rid of God so government will be the God and it will fit Carl Marx ideas. When I am writing things to be read I can't get my thoughts on paper fast enought to keep them complete. There may be gaps in my writing but that is because I thought what to say a long time before I could type it like milliseconds.
The project I am working on that I talked about I wish I could give you details on and you would see how it fits. But I can't if I am going to make money with it.
Looking back I worded that wrong. My intent was not to say a god belief is necessarily irrational from a personal point of view, but that atheists default to a god belief as irrational.
I believe in God (just not the anthropomorphic white dude with a beard who creates things in 7 days as a literal story), and I believe science has uncovered strong evidence of natural selection and evolution. I have no reason to believe the two don't leave in harmony. I recommend Gould's "Rocks of Ages" as a read you might all enjoy.
I presented a discourse on the topic at a Table Lodge for Lombard 1098 GLofIL several years ago. I don't recall posting it here. Maybe I'll check to see if I have a digital copy to paste as a new thread based on your request.
No that a everyone should know that theory is not fact it has fact in it but it is not end all be all fact. It is a way for someone to explain the data that is missing and the parts that are not fact. Anyone that seaks to distory religion so the governemt becomes a replacement for it is comunistic. Governments that strive to elemanate religion are comunistic! Some day you need to read the comunist manafesto and see what Marx said about the enviroment. I will not quote it because you won't beleive it.So you have a problem.... not with Darwin's theory, or the scientific meaning of theory... but that you think Darwin was just trying to prove god doesn't exist and he was doing this because he was a communist? Is that what this boils down to? You do realize that Darwin himself maintained that "can be an ardent Theist and an evolutionist" and that he maintained that he was not an atheist but rather an agnostic. Linking Darwinism to Communism is just ridiculous, one has nothing to do with the other.