My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
In my experience, we are safe applying the more restrictive rule. We should remember that the usual position of GLs is that they maintain personal jurisdiction over their members no matter where they may be. I have seen GLs discipline their members for acts elsewhere. I think one was discussed...
No, one’s obligation doesn’t change when visiting.
One may be subject to additional laws in another jurisdiction. For instance, in Utah it is a masonic offense to give the aid or countenance of freemasonry to a lottery or gift enterprise.
There no such thing as a “UGLE chartered Mason.”
There are no UGLE chartered lodges in the Southern US.
Only four GLs have not recognized a PHA GL: MS, WV, AR, and SC. Florida is in amity with a PHA GL.
Where one lives is irrelevant for whether one follows the law of the grand lodge of which...
The Sovereign Grand Lodge of Egypt is not a regular grand lodge.
i join in the other comments.
You need to be off paper. It appears you are still on parole, and then you are subject to deportation. it would be most unlikely to admit a member on parole. You are not a free man, the government...
I think he is a UGLE mason. But for the modes of recognition , the work is committed to writing, and has been for hundreds of years.
But yes, I think we are all agreed he should be speaking to his lodge.