My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I’m sure the SGLs if aware are aware, they would consider it an invasion. However, the PHA LA is not recognized by any SGL. So, I guess we can put them on ”double secret probation.”
Good for them. PHA LA is reported to have invaded a number of jurisdictions. That is clearly an irregular practice. Regrettably, the other PHA GLs have not taken action, in part, it is said, out of fear of being sued by Mr. Slaughter as indicated by the TN litigation).
I cheated. The Commission just made findings on the Lebanon matter.
Yes, there are irregular groups as well.
The Grand Lodge of Lebanon
There has come before your Commission a request that a finding be made that this Grand Lodge meets the Standards of Recognition adopted by this Conference...
Well, the GL of Lebanon is not widely recognised, but it is regular in my personal view.
GLNF has a single lodge there.
One of the two Italian GLs does as well.