My Freemasonry | Freemason Information and Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Everyone Participate.. !

Would you allow visitation

  • Yes.

    Votes: 70 86.4%
  • No.

    Votes: 11 13.6%

  • Total voters
    81

Jacob Johnson

Registered User
I like "traveling". If we allowed visitation, I'd LOVE to go visit a PH lodge. I can't think of any reason to disallow visitation. If the traditions are THAT different, just restrict visitation to MMs only.

and i did vote yes.
 

poppatattoo

Registered User
As a Prince Hall Mason I would love to see how the 4 letters do it, I know things can't be that different. When this is allowed come and see us Pride Of The South lodge 324
 

barryguitar

Registered User
In this hypothetical situation, Are they offering to turn in their Grand Charter, and come in under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of Texas, and agreeing to abide by the Laws there-of?
Then Yes, absolutely.
 

Beathard

Premium Member
Neither side is likely to ever turn in their grand charter to join the other. Visitation is probably the next step.
 

Bill Lins

Moderating Staff
Staff Member
In this hypothetical situation, Are they offering to turn in their Grand Charter, and come in under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge of Texas, and agreeing to abide by the Laws there-of?
Then Yes, absolutely.

I take your answer to mean that, if they remained independent, you would not allow visitation- is that correct?
 

Beathard

Premium Member
Other grand lodges are independent (e.g. Maine), yet we still can visit. Texas says PH is regular, but does not allow visitation. It's just strange.
 

Brent Heilman

Premium Member
Other grand lodges are independent (e.g. Maine), yet we still can visit. Texas says PH is regular, but does not allow visitation. It's just strange.

I believe Oklahoma is the same way also. Indeed it is strange. I don't agree with it and hope that in the future it will change.
 

Brent Heilman

Premium Member
Bill_Lins77488 said:
I seem to remember that, when Oklahoma first recognized PHA, they did not allow visitation but have since changed their minds.

You are correct sir. When they first did it they only recognized them with no visitation. A committee was formed that came up with the guidelines that allowed visitation.

Sent from my iPhone using Freemasonry
 

Brent Heilman

Premium Member
View attachment 1954


No problem. I posted a power point presentation on another thread but I don't remember which one. The power point will show both the old compact, the proposed changes, and the new compact that was signed. Anyway, here it is.
 
Top