It was not meant as such. Rather, I was pointing out the irony of his public use of secret ritual language to prove that symbols are secret. A bit of irony, isn't it?
I've not heard that GA is tuned into the issue nor did I assert that was the current issue. I quite agree that bigotry is the basis for the separation in that Grand Lodge[/QUOTE
It was not meant as such. Rather, I was pointing out the irony of his public use of secret ritual language to prove that symbols are secret. A bit of irony, isn't it?
I've not heard that GA is tuned into the issue nor did I assert that was the current issue. I quite agree that bigotry is the basis for the separation in that Grand Lodge
I wasnt saying we cant have our S&C in public. I was showing everybody our obligation says we cant broadcast our symbols. My whole point is if YOU'RE GOING TO USE THE OBLIGATION TO JUSTIFY WHY WE SHOULDNT USE THE SIGNS IN PUBLIC TO SHOW ANOTHER MASON YOU ARE A BROTHER TOO, then you are at violation by having on paraphernalia in public. You cant frown on one part but be okay with another part. Me personally I don't see anything wrong with wearing the S&C nor using signs in public to signal another brother