I did not intent to imply that the ritual was the reason or source of the inscription, however, the inscription is specific as is its use in the ritual, it is not beneficial to debate which came first, but, within the context of the discussion, a blanket statement like that made by Cooper is at least brazen, even if he is the local expert.
I wonder if I could get away with making such a statement?
Probably not.
I wonder if I could get away with making such a statement?
Probably not.