Timothy Riser
Registered User
How do I go from a PHA TO AF&AM ?
Speaking on AF&AM AND F&AM. I work with a GL mason (Meaning not PHA) as me and him started talking, he said what are y'all PH masons ? I said we are F&AM. He said okay. As the conversation went to masons helping masons, he said "I don't know about AF&AM". I said, well the ones that aren't clandestine will help you just the same. He then stated "well I was taught AF&AM might help but a F&AM will help for sure".
Sent from my 831C using My Freemasonry Pro mobile app
Question : If two masons are talking, say one PH and the other GL but their GL does not recognize each other, and one says "On the ******" should you be able to trust that brother with your secrets even though his GL considers your GL clandestine ? Because technically his ob. Does no extend to you because you are considered clandestine to him. What are your thoughts ?
Sent from my 831C using My Freemasonry Pro mobile app
Nope. If it is against the ob to communicate masonically with a clandestine mason, then I will not do so. Period.Question : If two masons are talking, say one PH and the other GL but their GL does not recognize each other, and one says "On the ******" should you be able to trust that brother with your secrets even though his GL considers your GL clandestine ? Because technically his ob. Does no extend to you because you are considered clandestine to him. What are your thoughts ?
Sent from my 831C using My Freemasonry Pro mobile app
To me this has nothing to do with the OB. As it is not Masonic intercourse. Some one saying on the square to me that is not during open lodge would make me laugh. If you are speaking with someone and they/you are comfortable sharing something then obviously your relationship extends beyond masonry. There are alot of brothers that I wouldnt share my personal stuff with and alot of my friends that could never be masons that id share my life with!Question : If two masons are talking, say one PH and the other GL but their GL does not recognize each other, and one says "On the ******" should you be able to trust that brother with your secrets even though his GL considers your GL clandestine ? Because technically his ob. Does no extend to you because you are considered clandestine to him. What are your thoughts ?
Sent from my 831C using My Freemasonry Pro mobile app
I can agree. Life secrets, sure! Anything masonic, nope!To me this has nothing to do with the OB. As it is not Masonic intercourse. Some one saying on the square to me that is not during open lodge would make me laugh. If you are speaking with someone and they/you are comfortable sharing something then obviously your relationship extends beyond masonry. There are alot of brothers that I wouldnt share my personal stuff with and alot of my friends that could never be masons that id share my life with!
Sent from my LG-H811 using My Freemasonry Pro mobile app
Yes I know. That's why I asked the question in an earlier post about the difference in the two. This brother is not as educated on freemasonry as others, so I won't hold it against him.That makes absolutely no sense.
Why would I what ?I'm pretty sure they will except you with open arms...But I ask why would you so that???/G\
I believe that he was referencing the original poster's desire to switch from PHA to AF&AMWhy would I what ?
but their GL does not recognize each other
I know better when it comes to masonic secrets. I'm speaking in terms of personal. Because he is a mason you would think he could be trusted with anything.Masonic secrets? If there is no recognition then don't do anything that you would do to get past a tiler.
Personal secrets? The way the obligations in my mother jurisdiction are worded it needs to be a recognized jurisdiction. Some wording suggests regular rather than recognized.
Mostly if I'm going to discuss personal secrets I'm going to judge individually not matter the obligation.
I think that would come down to the individual brothers discretion. Personally, if I'm going to be trusting a man with my personal secrets, it's definitely going to be because I respect his as a man, Masonry would have nothing to do with it for me.I know better when it comes to masonic secrets. I'm speaking in terms of personal. Because he is a mason you would think he could be trusted with anything.
Right, but you would think you could trust a man more because he is a mason.I think that would come down to the individual brothers discretion. Personally, if I'm going to be trusting a man with my personal secrets, it's definitely going to be because I respect his as a man, Masonry would have nothing to do with it for me.
I get what you're saying, but unfortunately, that's not always the case. You could do that, but if it were entrusted to the wrong mason it would be just like telling a non mason who is known for spilling the beans. But I get your point.Right, but you would think you could trust a man more because he is a mason.