Bogus, Clandestine, Unrecognized, and In All Ways Irregular

Discussion in 'Masonic Blogs' started by My Freemasonry, Apr 20, 2016.

  1. JamestheJust

    JamestheJust Registered User

    1,690
    520
    113
    I am not familiar with the obligation for the EA in either, but I wonder if both required him to always proclaim that lodge as his mother lodge. If so, the second lodge/GL required him to break his previously sworn obligation.
     
  2. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
    Really?
     
  3. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
    Really?!
     
  4. Bill Lins

    Bill Lins Moderating Staff Staff Member

    4,344
    1,144
    183
    That requirement is not in the EA obligation under GLoTX.
     
  5. Tela.B

    Tela.B Registered User

    3
    0
    1
    It seems to me while we fussing about who's and who's wrong we need to come together as one while the 3 and 4 letter white mason is continuing to build a bridge and us that's right I said US feel like we the ones who started this first. I been on both sides of the fence if PHA feels like FA&AM is not legit take them to court, but all the back and forward is very childish.
     
  6. JamestheJust

    JamestheJust Registered User

    1,690
    520
    113
    Being "holier than thou" is a long standing practice - and may reflect upon progress achieved in the work of the EA.
     
  7. Glen Cook

    Glen Cook G A Cook Site Benefactor

    2,928
    3,366
    183
    Using abbreviations really doesn't help with a characterization of whether a GL is regular. For instance, there is a regular FAAM GL.
    Depending on the civil jurisdiction, there may not be a cause of action to the bring a clandestine body to court.
    To be ckear, the state GLs are not trying to build bridges with the historically black GLs unless they are PHA.
     
    MRichard and tldubb like this.
  8. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
    I just love being 'Irregular' - http://www.uniquefreemason.com

    Meanwhile, back in the real world......
     
    Tela.B likes this.
  9. Bloke

    Bloke Premium Member

    4,307
    3,035
    133
    VWBro... well done on that rank. I hear it's not easy to get via UGLE... or did you get it post there ?
     
  10. Glen Cook

    Glen Cook G A Cook Site Benefactor

    2,928
    3,366
    183
    No. He didn't get his rank via UGLE.
     
  11. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
    Thanks for visiting me website. Meanwhile, back in the real world.....
     
  12. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
  13. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
  14. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
     
  15. Glen Cook

    Glen Cook G A Cook Site Benefactor

    2,928
    3,366
    183
    And if this behaviour occurred, it should be considered intolerable, regardless of whether you have the autism diagnosis or a neurological diagnosis. I'm surprised you didn't report the matter to the police and bring a civil action against those whom you indicate said these things.

    However, the issue is your less than candid sig line. As one who purportedly sees things in black and white, surely you would wish to include your obedience so people don't think you are a UGLE Mason, an organisation from which you have separated yourself
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2017
    Bill Lins and Warrior1256 like this.
  16. Joe Ellis

    Joe Ellis https://UniqueFreemason.com Premium Member

    61
    32
    38
    You seem more concerned about 'sig line' and other Mason issues then most things. Meanwhile, back in the real world...
     
    mrpierce17 likes this.
  17. Glen Cook

    Glen Cook G A Cook Site Benefactor

    2,928
    3,366
    183
    Oh, not at all, but this is a Masonic forum, and so we tend to discuss "Mason issues."
     
    Bill Lins, Warrior1256 and MRichard like this.
  18. Tela.B

    Tela.B Registered User

    3
    0
    1
    Understandable, it's like in masonry right regular guys and you have the outlaws both is wearing the square and compass but to keep down the commotion and confront the problem, we'll go back and forward about who is a true mason. If I was a true cop and somebody is acting like a cop I'll confront the person or persons take them to court and get the truth. that's why both sides need to seat down and have a discussion.
     
  19. Glen Cook

    Glen Cook G A Cook Site Benefactor

    2,928
    3,366
    183
    Not entirely sure what the two sides are which you are referencing, but if you are talking about PHA v Bogus GLs, nothing to discuss. We know that PHA is legitimate and the others aren't.

    Here is the Way the discussion would go:

    " You are bogus."

    "No we're not."

    "Yes, you are."

    Done
     
    MRichard, Tela.B, Bill Lins and 2 others like this.
  20. Warrior1256

    Warrior1256 Site Benefactor

    7,335
    3,330
    183
    Agreed!
     

Share My Freemasonry