Bloke
Premium Member
Sound like a fair assessment. I think Freemasonry is a very broad term which picks up a lot of organisations and "Regular" is a subjective term, but also critical to the boundaries of where and what we can experience as "Regular" Freemasons.I understand now the point we disagree on, and it isn't regularity. It's back to the concept of an "overarching" organization where all groups regular, irregular etc are Freemasons. You appear to believe that exists whereas I do not.