jvarnell
Premium Member
Ok I'm watchin AA right now and they're talking about a Mayan complex where the legend says it was built over night, and of course the AA are believing it to be literal. This is why I say watch the documentary.
I just got back from a vacation with not commuiacations devices and saw this. Belief is up to everyone's own inturpation. The word debunk should be only applyed to the data used, but using a small amout of data to give a blinket statment anceint alieans beleivers have been debunked is like saying skip the anti-mason has debuncked masonery. I don't understand why someone feels the need to say that what one person beleives is totally wrong. You may think that but they don't they just think you have pointed out some parts of there theroy they need to work on.
As a Mason I need to not dwell on telling some one there beleifs are wrong but look at the one comman theme is that they beleive there is a SAOTU and then show them Masnary can make them better men. The documentary is debuncking information you should do with all subjects not the beleif or theory.
Also is this subject in the right place should it be under Polictics and Religion or did I tie it to Genral Masonary with the last sentance.